Show simple item record

dc.contributorSchonfeld, Martin
dc.contributor.editorStanley Bailis
dc.contributor.editorJames A. Bell
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-10T20:26:01Z
dc.date.available2016-03-10T20:26:01Z
dc.date.issued1998
dc.identifier.citationSchonfeld, Martin. "How much is enough? The limits of interdisciplinary openness in environmental ethics." Issues in Integrative Studies 16 (1998): 9-29.
dc.identifier.issn1081-4760
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10323/4172
dc.description.abstractOne of the most interdisciplinary and integrative branches of philosophy is environmental ethics. It is closely associated with the movement that has arguably been the most transformative public phenomenon in the past three decades, and during its brief history, it has experienced dramatic transformations of its own. Originally an interdisciplinary effort at the unlikely juncture of forestry and philosophy, it has grown into an applied branch of moral philosophy that is situated in the context of ecology, environmental economics, and public policy. I argue that environmental ethics is in need of another transformation: its long-term viability requires the consolidation of its basis-- that is, the justification of its core claims. The current conception of environmental ethics as an applied approach suffers from the absence of a coherent foundation. In the short run, the attention to this foundational, disciplinary labor would limit the interdisciplinary openness of environmental ethics; in the long run, however, these very limitations will ensure the worth of environmental ethics as an integrative approach that can fruitfully interact with other disciplines.
dc.publisherAssociation for Interdisciplinary Studies
dc.relation.ispartofIssues in Interdisciplinary Studies
dc.titleHow Much Is Enough? The Limits of Interdisciplinary Openness in Environmental Ethics


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record