The Global Warming Debate: Notes from the Dismal Science

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorFolland, Sherman T.
dc.contributor.editorNixon, Jude V.
dc.coverage.temporal2000s
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-11T12:11:39Z
dc.date.available2020-05-11T12:11:39Z
dc.date.issued2007-10-01
dc.description.abstract...this column directs its main attention to explaining the surprising and consequential arguments among environmental economists, all of whom assume as premise the existence of global warming and that humans contribute to it. As you will see, these economists argue, not over whether the planet has a problem, but about how much it will cost.en_US
dc.identifier.citationFolland, Sherman T. "The Global Warming Debate: Notes from the Dismal Science" Oakland Journal 13. (2007). 175-185en_US
dc.identifier.issn1529-4005
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10323/7730
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherOakland Universityen_US
dc.relation.ispartofOakland Journal Number 13: Fall 2007en_US
dc.rightsCopyright held by Oakland Universityen_US
dc.subjectGlobal warmingen_US
dc.subjectClimate changeen_US
dc.subjectGreenhouse gasesen_US
dc.titleThe Global Warming Debate: Notes from the Dismal Scienceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
13_global_warming.pdf
Size:
194.58 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.41 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Oakland Journal Number 13: Fall 2007