Show simple item record

dc.contributorSzostak, Rick
dc.contributor.editorJay Wentworth
dc.contributor.editorDavid Sebberson
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-29T19:18:12Z
dc.date.available2016-11-29T19:18:12Z
dc.date.issued2002
dc.identifier.citationSzostak, Rick. "How to Do Interdisciplinarity: Integrating the Debate." Issues in Integrative Studies 20 (2002): 103-122.
dc.identifier.issn1081-4760
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10323/4393
dc.description.abstractThis paper develops a twelve-step process for interdisciplinary research. While individual researchers cannot be expected to follow all of these steps in every research project, the process alerts them to the dangers of omitting steps. Moreover, communities of interdisciplinary researchers should ensure that all steps are followed. The process draws upon earlier efforts by William (Bill) Newell and Julie Thompson Klein. It also draws inductively upon the debate concerning Newell’s theory of interdisciplinarity in the last issue of this journal; all of the concerns raised during that debate find a place in this process. Finally, the paper illustrates how several classifications developed by the author facilitate interdisciplinary research.
dc.publisherAssociation for Interdisciplinary Studies
dc.relation.ispartofIssues in Interdisciplinary Studies
dc.titleHow to Do Interdisciplinarity: Integrating the Debate


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record